Partial Fractions
Splitting awkward fractions apart
Splitting a fraction to conquer it
The key that unlocks second-order rate laws
A fraction with a factored denominator can be rewritten as a sum of simpler fractions, each over one factor:
Find A and B with the cover-up method: multiply through by the full denominator, then substitute the value of x that makes one factor zero — the other term vanishes, leaving only one unknown to solve. Each simple piece then integrates to a logarithm.
In chemistry the method appears whenever you need to integrate a rate equation that contains a product of two linear concentration terms. The second-order rate law for with unequal initial concentrations requires integrating — impossible without first splitting into partial fractions. Consecutive first-order reactions give the same type of integral.
Step zero: is the fraction proper? If the degree of the numerator is greater than or equal to the degree of the denominator, do a polynomial long division first to get a polynomial plus a proper fraction. Only the proper-fraction remainder is then decomposed. Skipping this step produces a completely wrong decomposition.
Repeated linear factors require an extra term for each repeat. If one factor is , the partial-fraction form must include both and . Setting finds B (cover-up still works for the highest power), but you need a second equation (e.g. x = 0 or comparing coefficients) to find A.
In chemistry the cover-up method is often presented as a shortcut, but the underlying principle is simply multiplying both sides by one factor at a time and evaluating at its root. The same procedure scales to any number of distinct linear factors.
- Improper fractions: reduce first. If the numerator degree ≥ denominator degree, perform polynomial division first. Attempting partial fractions directly on an improper fraction gives wrong constants.
- Repeated factors need two terms. decomposes to , not just . Using only one term leaves the decomposition incomplete.
- Sign errors in cover-up. When setting in a factor , the value substituted everywhere is , including in the numerator. Substituting 1 instead is very common.
- Forgetting to integrate each piece separately. After decomposing, each term integrates to , not to .
Decomposer
Choose an example fraction — the widget shows its decomposition and integral, and overlays the two curves to confirm they match.
Decompose into partial fractions and hence find the integral.
For with rate , initial concentrations and (), and , show that integrating the rate equation gives the log form of the second-order integrated rate law.
Worked examples
Consecutive first-order reactions and a repeated factor — the two cases beyond the basics.
For the scheme , the Laplace-transform solution for [B](t) contains a factor from a partial-fraction split. Write the integral in terms of its partial-fraction result and state [B](t).
Decompose (a repeated linear factor, appearing when in consecutive reactions) and integrate (or inverse-Laplace) to find [B](t).
For the reaction , second-order kinetics are observed with and .
After 120 s, (so x = 0.0090 M). Use the integrated second-order rate law to find k.
Decompose into partial fractions (where x represents the extent of reaction) and hence write out the integral that gives the integrated rate law.
Decompose into partial fractions and hence find .
For the consecutive scheme with, , and :
(a) Write down the Bateman equation for [B](t) (derived from the partial-fraction approach in example 3 above).
(b) Find the time at which [B] is a maximum, and evaluate .
Check yourself
Four questions on partial-fraction decomposition and its applications.
Partial-fraction decomposition rewrites one complicated fraction as: