Quadratics & Equilibria
ICE tables and the quadratic formula
When the unknown is squared
Equilibrium problems are quadratics in disguise
A quadratic has the form . Its graph is a parabola, and the solutions are where it crosses the x-axis. The quadratic formula always works:
The discriminant tells you how many real roots there are: positive → two distinct roots, zero → one repeated root, negative → no real roots. In chemistry you will almost always have two real roots but only one is physically meaningful (e.g. concentrations cannot be negative).
Weak-acid and solubility equilibria are the most common source of quadratics. Setting up an ICE (Initial / Change / Equilibrium) table gives , which rearranges to the standard form . When x is small (less than 5% of C₀) the approximation saves effort; otherwise use the full formula.
The 5% rule is a short-cut, not a law. For a weak-acid problem with , if you first solve approximately () and that value is less than 5% of , the approximation is safe. If it exceeds 5%, solve the full quadratic. A useful alternative is the successive-approximation method: substitute into in the denominator, getting a better , and repeat until convergence — usually two or three cycles.
Common-ion problems add a twist: if the solution already contains from a salt, the ICE table for rearranges to . The common ion suppresses dissociation, so x is much smaller — but you still need the quadratic formula or the 5% check to be sure.
- Choosing the negative root. The quadratic formula always gives two roots; for concentration problems only the positive root is physical. Always check both and discard the negative (or unphysical) one.
- Dropping x when the 5% rule fails. If , setting introduces a significant error. Use the full quadratic.
- Forgetting to rearrange into standard form first. must be multiplied out to before applying to the quadratic formula.
- Common-ion: wrong ICE setup. If a common ion is already present at concentration S, the equilibrium expression for A⁻ is , not just x. Using x alone overestimates dissociation.
Quadratic solver
Adjust a, b, c to see the parabola and its roots. Watch the discriminant change sign when the parabola lifts off the axis.
Solve and identify which root would be physically rejected in a chemistry context where x represents a concentration.
Equilibrium (Ka)
Drag the pKa and initial concentration to see when the 5% approximation breaks down.
Acetic acid (CH₃COOH) has . Find and pH in a solution.
Worked examples
Solubility equilibrium and a discriminant that determines whether precipitation occurs.
Silver chloride dissolves: , . Find the molar solubility s in pure water.
Hydrofluoric acid has . Solve for in a solution, and show that the approximation fails the 5% test.
A buffer contains 0.100 M acetic acid and 0.100 M sodium acetate (). Show that the Henderson–Hasselbalch approximation gives pH = 4.74, and confirm that the exact quadratic treatment agrees to within 0.01 pH units.
Find the molar solubility of AgCl () in a solution already containing NaCl (which provides a common Cl⁻ ion). Compare with the solubility in pure water.
Chloroacetic acid (ClCH₂COOH) has . Find the exact and pH in a solution, showing that the 5% approximation is invalid here.
A buffer is made by adding sodium formate (HCOONa) to 0.0200 M formic acid (HCOOH, ) so that . This gives a low buffer capacity, so x (the protons released) is NOT negligible compared with the formate concentration. Set up and solve the exact quadratic to find .
Check yourself
Four questions linking the quadratic formula to equilibrium chemistry.
The quadratic formula solves ax² + bx + c = 0. What is it?